Crosby v. Beaird

93 A.D.2d 852, 461 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17712
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 1983·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.), entered January 14,1982, which dismissed their complaint against the defendants, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The trial court erred in giving the jury a missing witness charge regarding the plaintiffs’ failure to produce the infant plaintiff (who was only five years of age at the time of the underlying accident), without also instructing the jury to consider the infant’s age and the circumstances surrounding the accident in determining whether or not they deemed it appropriate in this case to invoke the permissible inferences authorized in such a charge (see Treuhaft v Bender, 193 App Div 666, affd 233 NY 556). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosby v. Beaird, 93 A.D.2d 852, 461 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

93 A.D.2d 852 (Crosby v. Beaird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Quinones
41 A.D.3d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Mahoney v. NAMCO Cybertainment, Inc.
282 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Wyman v. J. Giarnella & Son, Inc.
170 A.D.2d 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Edwards
161 A.D.2d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)