Crosby v. Beaird
This text of 93 A.D.2d 852 (Crosby v. Beaird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.), entered January 14,1982, which dismissed their complaint against the defendants, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The trial court erred in giving the jury a missing witness charge regarding the plaintiffs’ failure to produce the infant plaintiff (who was only five years of age at the time of the underlying accident), without also instructing the jury to consider the infant’s age and the circumstances surrounding the accident in determining whether or not they deemed it appropriate in this case to invoke the permissible inferences authorized in such a charge (see Treuhaft v Bender, 193 App Div 666, affd 233 NY 556). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Brown, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A.D.2d 852, 461 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-beaird-nyappdiv-1983.