Crosby ex rel. Crosby v. Calhoun

76 So. 2d 297, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1903
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 So. 2d 297 (Crosby ex rel. Crosby v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crosby ex rel. Crosby v. Calhoun, 76 So. 2d 297, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1903 (Fla. 1954).

Opinion

DREW, Justice.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the lower court abused its discretion in reducing the amount of the weekly payments required of a defendant by the final decree in a bastardy proceeding.

The original decree was entered pursuant to a stipulation and provided for payments for expenses of birth, costs, attorneys’ fees and $10 per week for the maintenance of the bastard child if born alive. Several months after this decree was entered, application was made for a reduction of the amount of the weekly maintenance under Section 742.06, F.S.1951, F.S.A. A hearing was had on the petition and as a consequence thereof an order was entered reducing the amount to $5 per week.

We have carefully considered the evidence on the basis of which the lower court reduced the amount of the award. The evidence does not show any changed conditions which would afford a basis for altering the provisions of the original decree. The record establishes that if there has been any change of condition in the ap-pellee’s circumstances, it is for the better. Under such circumstances it was a clear abuse of discretion to tamper with the provisions of the original decree which were conclusive as to the conditions then existing. See Schiff v. Schiff, Fla., 1951, 54 So.2d 36; Gaffny v. Gaffny, 129 Fla. 172, 176 So. 68; Belford v. Belford, 1947, 159 Fla. 547, 32 So.2d 312, Chastain v. Chastain, Fla., 1954, 73 So.2d 66.

The decree of the lower court is hereby reversed with directions to reinstate the original decree.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attaway v. Attaway
80 So. 2d 352 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 So. 2d 297, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-ex-rel-crosby-v-calhoun-fla-1954.