Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 2, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2011-0627·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MELVIN CROSBY‐BEY ) a.k.a. ANTHONY CROSBY‐BEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11‐0627 (RLW) ) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE ) COMMISSION et al., ) ) Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM

By Order of July 26, 2011, Petitioner was directed to respond to Respondents’ motion to

dismiss this habeas corpus action by August 24, 2011. He was advised that the failure to respond

could result in the granting of the motion as conceded. Petitioner has neither filed a response nor

sought additional time to do so. Therefore, the Court will grant Respondents’ motion as

conceded and dismiss the case. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum.

________/s/____________ ROBERT L. WILKINS United States District Judge Date: September 2, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission, (D.D.C. 2011).

Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission (Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.