Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission
This text of Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission (Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MELVIN CROSBY‐BEY ) a.k.a. ANTHONY CROSBY‐BEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11‐0627 (RLW) ) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE ) COMMISSION et al., ) ) Respondents. )
MEMORANDUM
By Order of July 26, 2011, Petitioner was directed to respond to Respondents’ motion to
dismiss this habeas corpus action by August 24, 2011. He was advised that the failure to respond
could result in the granting of the motion as conceded. Petitioner has neither filed a response nor
sought additional time to do so. Therefore, the Court will grant Respondents’ motion as
conceded and dismiss the case. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum.
________/s/____________ ROBERT L. WILKINS United States District Judge Date: September 2, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crosby Bey v. United States Parole Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-bey-v-united-states-parole-commission-dcd-2011.