Crooms v. State
543 So. 2d 415, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2824, 1989 WL 52817
This text of 543 So. 2d 415 (Crooms v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crooms v. State, 543 So. 2d 415, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2824, 1989 WL 52817 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
Having concluded that the matters presented herein are controlled by Gipson v. State, 537 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Walker v. State, 514 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987) and that defendants’ motion to suppress should have been granted, we reverse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gipson v. State
537 So. 2d 1080 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Walker v. State
514 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 415, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2824, 1989 WL 52817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crooms-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.