Crooks v. State Ex Rel. Pierce

194 So. 237, 141 Fla. 597
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 16, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 194 So. 237 (Crooks v. State Ex Rel. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crooks v. State Ex Rel. Pierce, 194 So. 237, 141 Fla. 597 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Chapman, J.

On the 6th day of May, 1939, an alternative writ of mandamus issued out of the Circuit Court *599 of St. Lucie County, Florida, on a petition in the name of the State of Florida, upon the relation of E. R. Pierce, as Tax Assessor of St. Lucie County, Florida, against the Board of Commissioners of the Fort Pierce Port District, the respondents. The parties in this opinion will be referred to as relator and respondents as they appeared in the lower court.

The alternative writ recited that the relator assessed taxes for the Fort Pierce Port District for the year 1936 and under Chapter 17876, Acts of 1937, Laws of Florida, was entitled to a commission therefor in the sum of $1,805.35; that he assessed taxes for the Port District for the year 1938 in thé total sum of $91,545.84; that Section 1031 C. G. L. makes it the duty of the County Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pay relator on the 1st of each month during the year 1939 the sum of $122.06; that relator has received the sum of $290.00 from the district for the year 1939, leaving a balance due him in the sum of $320.30. The alternative writ prayed for an order requiring the payment h> the relator the sum of $1,805.35 for commissions due for the year 1936, and the sum of $320.30 as balance due for 1939, and the total amount claimed by relator as a balance due was computed under Chapter 17876, supra.

On motion to quash the alternative writ it was contended: (a) that Chapter 17876, Acts of 1937,. Laws of Florida, did not control compensation for the assessment of taxes for the year 1936, (b) there is no controlling provision of law regulating the commissions of the relator for the year 1936. These and other grounds appear in the motion to quash, which was overruled and denied by the lower court.

An answer or return was filed by the respondents to the alternative writ in which it was denied that relator was *600 entitled to compensation for assessment of taxes for the year 1936 and payable out of the money of the district. The answer showed that the relator’s commissions were controlled by Chapter 18538, Special Acts of 1937, Laws of Florida, and the amount thereof was $50.00 per month, beginning with the year 1937, and the relator had been fully compensated; that paragraph three of the alternative writ recites that Chapter 17876, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1937, was approved by the House of Representatives by a vote of 79 for the passage and 3 opposed, while 21 Senators voted for its passage and 11 voted against it, and 37 Senators were ■present at the time it was passed.

Counsel for the respective parties entered into, filed, and made a part of the record a stipulation of facts, viz.:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto as follows:
“1. That the allegations contained in paragraph number 3 of the alternative writ with regard to the number of representatives and senators present and their vote on Senate Bill number 333 are true and correct.
“2. That the Fort Pierce Port District has heretofore collected from taxes levied for said District for the year 1936 in excess of the sum- of Fifty-five Thousand ($55,000.00) Dollars for Interest and Sinking Fund purposes and in excess of the sum of Three Thousand ($3,000.00) Dollars for maintenance purposes.
“3. That there are no funds on hand in the treasury of said District at this time that were derived from the 1936 tax levy and that said funds which were derived from the 1936 tax levy have been used by said District prior to the institution of this suit for the purposes for which they were levied, to-wit: payment of principal and interest on the *601 Districts’ bonded indebtedness and for maintenance operations of the District.
“4. That the respondent did not contemplate and did not include any tax assessor’s commissions in their tax levy for the year 1936 and have not considered same in any subsequent levy.
“5. That there is now on hand in the treasury of the Fort Pierce Port District in their Interest and Sinking Fund account Twenty Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-nine Dollars and eighty-eight cents ($20,289.88) and in the Maintenance account Seven Hundred Thirty-five Dollars and sixty-eight cents ($735.68), which was collected on taxes assessed subsequent to the year 1936 for the payment of interest on Refunding Bonds issued by said District and which said sum of money now on hand is insufficient to meet the total of said interest due July 1st, 1939 on said Refunding Bonds and for maintenance operations of said District, for which said sums were levied.
“6. That the relator as tax assessor of St. Lucie County was paid One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars by the Fort Pierce Port District as payment in full for services rendered by the relator in assessing taxes for said District for the years 1929 to 1936, inclusive, said payment being made by said District pursuant to Chapter 18538, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1927, and that said payment was made on the 11th day of June, 1937, and was made with funds received by said District from special levies made prior to 1936.
“It is understood and agreed that the respondents insist that their answer filed in this cause is sufficient as a matter of law and that the taking of testimony or the stipulating as to the facts is unnecessary by reason thereof, and this stipulation is made for the purpose of expediting the final determination of this cause in the event the court is of the *602 opinion that any testimony is 'necessary. And these respondents object to the introduction of any testimony or stipulation as to the facts upon the sole ground that the same should not be required by the court.”

On June 9, 1939, the lower court granted a peremptory writ of mandamus, and a writ of error was obtained, transcript perfected and the case is here for review.

The first question for decision is whether or not the Tax Assessor of St. Lucie County is entitled to compensation for services rendered in assessing taxes for the year 1936 under Chapter 17876, Acts of 1937, Laws of Florida. It will be observed that the Act is applicable to the several counties ’ of Florida, or is a general law. It became a law without the approval of the Governor of Florida and was filed in the office of Secretary of State on June 14, 1937.

Section 1 of Chapter 17876, supra, provides that “the Tax Assessors of the several counties of the State of Florida shall be entitled to receive upon the amount of all taxes assessed * * * the following commissions on and including (a) county; (b) special school district; (c) and all other tax district taxes, general or special, that are provided by law to be assessed by the tax assessors of the several counties, viz.: On the first $5,000 a commission of 10°/o ; on the next $5,000, a commission of 5% ; on the balance collected a commission of 2J0-

Sections 3 and 4, supra, are, viz.:

“Section 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1991
State Ex Rel. Bayless v. Lee
23 So. 2d 575 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 237, 141 Fla. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crooks-v-state-ex-rel-pierce-fla-1940.