Crooks v. Crooks
68 P. 101, 6 Cal. Unrep. 878
This text of 68 P. 101 (Crooks v. Crooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crooks v. Crooks, 68 P. 101, 6 Cal. Unrep. 878 (Cal. 1902).
Opinion
It appearing that the appellant has proposed a bill of exceptions to be used on the appeal, and that said bill is not yet settled and certified, and that the failure to have such bill of exceptions settled was not caused by any laches or other fault of the appellant, the motion to dismiss is denied.
We concur: Beatty, C. J.; McFarland, J.; Harrison, J.; Garoutte, J.; Van Dyke, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 P. 101, 6 Cal. Unrep. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crooks-v-crooks-cal-1902.