Crooker v. Tessitore
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DENISE ANNE CROOKER, : CIVIL NO: 3:20-cv-01695 : Plaintiff, : (Judge Mannion) : v. : (Magistrate Judge Schwab) : GEORGE J. TESSITORE, et al., : : Defendants. :
ORDER January 13, 2022
Pending in this matter is the defendants’ summary judgment motion (doc. 99). In their reply brief, doc. 108, the defendants point out that the plaintiff failed to respond to their statement of material facts in accordance with Local Rule 56.1, and they request that the court deem their statement of material facts as unopposed. The plaintiff then filed a letter, doc. 110, regarding the defendants’ statement of material facts (doc. 101). In light of this letter, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall respond to the defendants’ statement of material facts in accordance with Local Rule 56.1 on or before January 27, 2022. The court has discretion as to how to respond to a failure to comply with Local Rule 56.1. Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc., 909 F.3d 604, 613–14 (3d Cir. 2018) (concluding that in response to a party’s failure to comply with M.D. Pa. L.R. 56.1 “the District Court's decision to employ any given sanction—out of the many possible sanctions available to it—is fully within the discretion of that Court”); cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(1) (“[i]f a party fails to properly support an
assertion of fact or fails to properly address another party’s assertion of fact as required by Rule 56(c), the court may . . . give an opportunity to properly support or address the fact[.]”). The court may give a party another opportunity to comply
with L.R. 56.1. See e.g. Hickey v. Merritt-Scully, No. 4:18-CV-01793, 2021 WL 949448, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2021). Accordingly, we will exercise our discretion and give the plaintiff another opportunity to comply with L.R. 56.1. Moreover, we will give the defendants
leave to file a supplemental reply brief after the plaintiff responds to their statement of material facts. Defendants may file a supplemental reply brief on or before February 10, 2022.
S/Susan E. Schwab Susan E. Schwab United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crooker v. Tessitore (Crooker v. Tessitore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.