Crooker v. Randall
53 Me. 355
Opinion
The facts admitted by the demurrer [356]*356would not authorize the rejection of the report of the referee; a fortiori, the Court will not grant a review. The "mistake” alleged was the fault of the petitioner’s counsel,- which the Court will not cure.
It does not appear that the newly discovered evidence is admissible, or that it is not cumulative; nor is the Court furnished with the whole evidence before the referee, to enable it to determine whéther the evidence is cumulative.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crooker v. Randall, 53 Me. 355 (Me. 1865).
53 Me. 355 (Crooker v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.