Crooker v. Howe

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

September 28, 1994
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-1591

                                MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                 ROBERT HOWE, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                      [Hon. Michael Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Michael Alan Crooker on brief pro se.
            ____________________
            Donald K. Stern,  United States  Attorney, and  Karen L.  Goodwin,
            _______________                                 _________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________

                                 ____________________

Per Curiam.   We have reviewed  the parties' briefs  and
                 __________

            the  record on appeal.  We affirm essentially for the reasons

            stated  in the  district  court's memorandum,  dated May  19,

            1994.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________