Crooker v. California
354 U.S. 908
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1957
DocketNo. 707
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 354 U.S. 908 (Crooker v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crooker v. California, 354 U.S. 908 (1957).
Opinion
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition for the writ which read as follows:
“1. Was the defendant denied due process of law by the refusal of the investigation officers to allow him to consult with an attorney upon demand being made to do so while he was in custody?
“2. Was the defendant denied due process of law by the admission into evidence of a confession which was taken from him while in custody and after he had been in such custody for fourteen hours and had not been allowed to consult with his attorney?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Delaney
351 P.2d 85 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
354 U.S. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crooker-v-california-scotus-1957.