Crooke v. Board of Commissioners

36 Ind. 320
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Downey, J.

This was a complaint by Crooke against the appellees to enjoin them from levying a tax under the act of May 12th, 1869, authorizing counties and townships to aid in the construction of railroads, etc. The circuit court refused the injunction. We think it should have granted it. Section three of the act requires that the notice given to the voters, by the auditor,of the election, shall specify the amount to be appropriated. The notice in this instance was defec[321] tive in not giving this information. As this defect renders the election and all subsequent proceedings under it illegal, we will hot examine any of the other questions made.

T. R. Cobb, y. M Van Trees, and N F, Malott, for appel- ■ lant. y W. Burton, S. H Taylor, and y. H. O'Neall, for appellees.

■ The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crooke v. Board of Commissioners, 36 Ind. 320 (Ind. 1871).

36 Ind. 320 (Crooke v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott v. Tillamook County
168 P. 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
City of Oswego v. Davis
154 P. 1124 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Cincinnati, Wabash, & Michigan Railroad v. Wells
39 Ind. 539 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)