Crook v. E. I. duPont de Nemours Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crook v. E. I. duPont de Nemours Co.

216 A.D.2d 927, 629 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7256

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 927 (Crook v. E. I. duPont de Nemours Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crook v. E. I. duPont de Nemours Co., 216 A.D.2d 927, 629 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: With respect to the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, we affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. With respect to the preclusion motions, we affirm insofar as the court granted the motion of PPG Industries, Inc., for a final order of preclusion. We modify the order on appeal, however, by granting a final order of preclusion with respect to the motion of Auto Finishers Supply Company, Inc., unless plaintiffs serve answers to interrogatories and discovery demands upon it within 10 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: With respect to the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, we affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. With respect to the preclusion motions, we affirm insofar as the court granted the motion of PPG Industries, Inc., for a final order of preclusion. We modify the order on appeal, however, by granting a final order of preclusion with respect to the motion of Auto Finishers Supply Company, Inc., unless plaintiffs serve answers to interrogatories and discovery demands upon it within 10 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 927, 629 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crook-v-e-i-dupont-de-nemours-co-nyappdiv-1995.