Crook v. Citizens Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Crook v. Citizens Bank

111 S.E. 916, 153 Ga. 301, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 71

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1922

DocketNo. 2971

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 916 (Crook v. Citizens Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crook v. Citizens Bank, 111 S.E. 916, 153 Ga. 301, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 71 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where the defendant fraudulently obtained money from the plaintiff and invested it in personal property, the plaintiff, who seeks to assert an equitable title or lien upon the property so purchased with his funds, is entitled to the appointment of a receiver to take charge of such property, and a temporary injunction, where the defendant is insolvent and there is danger of the loss of such equitable title or lien by the sale of such property by the insolvent defendant, Ross v. Fletcher, 148 Ga. 147 (96 S. E. 1); 23 Ruling Case Law, 20, § 13.

2. Under the pleadings and evidence in this case the judge did not err in granting an interlocutory injunction and appointing a temporary receiver.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. Where the defendant fraudulently obtained money from the plaintiff and invested it in personal property, the plaintiff, who seeks to assert an equitable title or lien upon the property so purchased with his funds, is entitled to the appointment of a receiver to take charge of such property, and a temporary injunction, where the defendant is insolvent and there is danger of the loss of such equitable title or lien by the sale of such property by the insolvent defendant, Ross v. Fletcher, 148 Ga. 147 (96 S. E. 1); 23 Ruling Case Law, 20, § 13.

2. Under the pleadings and evidence in this case the judge did not err in granting an interlocutory injunction and appointing a temporary receiver.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 916, 153 Ga. 301, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crook-v-citizens-bank-ga-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack