Cronshaw v. Cronshaw

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Cronshaw v. Cronshaw

42 A. 515, 21 R.I. 126, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 45

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided December 30, 1898·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) We think that the share of the proceeds of the sale of the land in the partition suit, which would have belonged to John Oronshaw if he had survived, is to be treated as land. Freem. Oot. § 549.

We also think that the appellant, Julia Oronshaw, is entitled to have the same set off to her, to hold in addition to her dower, as provided in Glen. Laws R. I. cap. 214, § 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

(1) We think that the share of the proceeds of the sale of the land in the partition suit, which would have belonged to John Oronshaw if he had survived, is to be treated as land. Freem. Oot. § 549.

We also think that the appellant, Julia Oronshaw, is entitled to have the same set off to her, to hold in addition to her dower, as provided in Glen. Laws R. I. cap. 214, § 4.

Cronshaw v. Cronshaw, 42 A. 515, 21 R.I. 126, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 45 (R.I. 1898).

Pincite

42 A. 515 (Cronshaw v. Cronshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.