Cronly v. Brown
12 Wend. 271
This text of 12 Wend. 271 (Cronly v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cronly v. Brown, 12 Wend. 271 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).
Opinion
By the Court,
A variance between the writ and declaration is now pleadable in abatement; such variance could in no case be pleaded without craving oyer of the writ, in respect to which the practice is settled that the defendant cannot have such oyer. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 438, 9, and the cases, there cited.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reeder v. Moore
55 N.W. 436 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
People v. White
11 Barb. 26 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 Wend. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronly-v-brown-nysupct-1835.