Cronly v. Brown

12 Wend. 271
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 19, 1835·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

A variance between the writ and declaration is now pleadable in abatement; such variance could in no case be pleaded without craving oyer of the writ, in respect to which the practice is settled that the defendant cannot have such oyer. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 438, 9, and the cases, there cited.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cronly v. Brown, 12 Wend. 271 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).

12 Wend. 271 (Cronly v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeder v. Moore
55 N.W. 436 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
People v. White
11 Barb. 26 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)