Cronkhite v. White

Indiana Supreme Court

Cronkhite v. White

19 Ind. 174

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 174 (Cronkhite v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cronkhite v. White, 19 Ind. 174 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action by White against the appellants,. to recover the value of one hundred bushels of corn.

Finding and judgment for the plaintiff.

The case is before us on the evidence, which is, in some .respects, conflicting; but, taking the strongest view of it for the plaintiff, it fails to make out such a case as entitles , him to recover. ■ .

Joseph II. Brown and James Park, for the appellants. Gregory and Hooper, for the appellee.

' The judgment helow is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for another trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Action by White against the appellants,. to recover the value of one hundred bushels of corn.

Finding and judgment for the plaintiff.

The case is before us on the evidence, which is, in some .respects, conflicting; but, taking the strongest view of it for the plaintiff, it fails to make out such a case as entitles , him to recover. ■ .

Joseph II. Brown and James Park, for the appellants. Gregory and Hooper, for the appellee.

' The judgment helow is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for another trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ind. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronkhite-v-white-ind-1862.