Cronin v. Zimmerman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Cronin v. Zimmerman

90 N.E. 339, 45 Ind. App. 712, 1910 Ind. App. LEXIS 252

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1910

DocketNo. 6,694

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.E. 339 (Cronin v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cronin v. Zimmerman, 90 N.E. 339, 45 Ind. App. 712, 1910 Ind. App. LEXIS 252 (Ind. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Hadley, J.

Appellant sued appellee for libel. Appellee demurred to appellant’s complaint for waul of facts, which demurrer was sustained. Appellant refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against her.

The complaint in all substantial particulars Is the same as the complaint in Cronin v. Zimmerman (1909), 44 Ind. App. 118, and upon the authority and reasoning of that case this cause is reversed, with instructions to overrule demurrer to the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hadley, J.

Appellant sued appellee for libel. Appellee demurred to appellant’s complaint for waul of facts, which demurrer was sustained. Appellant refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against her.

The complaint in all substantial particulars Is the same as the complaint in Cronin v. Zimmerman (1909), 44 Ind. App. 118, and upon the authority and reasoning of that case this cause is reversed, with instructions to overrule demurrer to the complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.E. 339, 45 Ind. App. 712, 1910 Ind. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronin-v-zimmerman-indctapp-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack