Cronin v. Totoro

11 F.2d 140
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 1926
DocketNo. 6915; No. 6923; No. 6935; No. 6936; No. 6942; No. 6945; No. 6946; No. 6949; No. 6953
StatusPublished

This text of 11 F.2d 140 (Cronin v. Totoro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cronin v. Totoro, 11 F.2d 140 (8th Cir. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of this court in No. 6921, Dennis H. Cronin, United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska et al. v. William J. Fox, 11 F.(2d) 139 (opinion this day filed) is determinative of the questions involved in each of these eases. The order in each ease sustaining the application for writ of habeas corpus and discharging the prisoner from custody and imprisonment is reversed, and each cause is remanded to the District Court, with instructions to vacate the order in each case sustaining the writ, discharge the same, and remand the prisoner to the custody of the appellants or their successors in office.

Reversed and remanded. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cronin v. Fox
11 F.2d 139 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F.2d 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronin-v-totoro-ca8-1926.