Cronin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cronin v. State

79 S.E. 747, 13 Ga. App. 652, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 293

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 28, 1913

Docket5087

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 79 S.E. 747 (Cronin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cronin v. State, 79 S.E. 747, 13 Ga. App. 652, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. On the trial, of an indictment containing two counts, the first charging the accused with the offense of selling intoxicating liquors, and the second with keeping intoxicating liquors on hand at his place of business, where the defense relied upon was that he kept the liquors at a social club and furnished them to members thereof, and had paid to the State the license tax of $500, the following excerpt from the charge of the court is not only not erroneous, but clearly states the law applicable to that issue: “I charge you that that statute [referring to the tax act of 1909 as to clubs — Civil Code, § 933] does not permit any club, organization, or association to sell or barter for a valuable consideration alcoholic, spirituous, or intoxicating liquors. That statute does permit an organization or club, or an association, either as an entity, as a corporation, or as a body of men, or as individuals, to keep on hand at the place selected by them, for the use of the members, alcoholic, spirituous, or intoxicating liquors, upon the payment of the license tax required by the General Assembly. But I charge you that the liquor so kept on hand for such club, organization, or association must-belong to the club, association, or organization, either as a.body, or to the individual members composing such club, association, or organi-’ zation; and it is a violation of the law for such club, association, or organization, or any individual member thereof, to sell or barter for a valuable consideration alcoholic, spirituous, or intoxicating liquors.” Union & Mechanics Club v. Atlanta, 136 Ga. 721 (71 S. E. 1060).

2. The instructions objected to, when considered in connection with the entire charge of the court, are without material error.

3. The evidence demanded a conviction on both counts of the indictment. ’The general verdict of guilty was therefore proper, and if any error of law was committed, it was wholly immaterial. Judgment affirmed-.’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. On the trial, of an indictment containing two counts, the first charging the accused with the offense of selling intoxicating liquors, and the second with keeping intoxicating liquors on hand at his place of business, where the defense relied upon was that he kept the liquors at a social club and furnished them to members thereof, and had paid to the State the license tax of $500, the following excerpt from the charge of the court is not only not erroneous, but clearly states the law applicable to that issue: “I charge you that that statute [referring to the tax act of 1909 as to clubs — Civil Code, § 933] does not permit any club, organization, or association to sell or barter for a valuable consideration alcoholic, spirituous, or intoxicating liquors. That statute does permit an organization or club, or an association, either as an entity, as a corporation, or as a body of men, or as individuals, to keep on hand at the place selected by them, for the use of the members, alcoholic, spirituous, or intoxicating liquors, upon the payment of the license tax required by the General Assembly. But I charge you that the liquor so kept on hand for such club, organization, or association must-belong to the club, association, or organization, either as a.body, or to the individual members composing such club, association, or organi-’ zation; and it is a violation of the law for such club, association, or organization, or any individual member thereof, to sell or barter for a valuable consideration alcoholic, spirituous, or intoxicating liquors.” Union & Mechanics Club v. Atlanta, 136 Ga. 721 (71 S. E. 1060).

2. The instructions objected to, when considered in connection with the entire charge of the court, are without material error.

3. The evidence demanded a conviction on both counts of the indictment. ’The general verdict of guilty was therefore proper, and if any error of law was committed, it was wholly immaterial. Judgment affirmed-.’

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.E. 747, 13 Ga. App. 652, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronin-v-state-gactapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack