Cronin v. Epstein

City of New York Municipal Court

Cronin v. Epstein

1 N.Y.S. 69, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1188

DecidedMay 28, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y.S. 69 (Cronin v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cronin v. Epstein, 1 N.Y.S. 69, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1188 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

No specific time was fixed for the completion of the repairs by the landlord. There was, therefore, no breach of covenant on his part. The rent became due and payable under the lease, and was not paid. A tender was made; but, to be available, it must be kept good at all times. The debt is not paid by the tender. There was nothing in the case which required its submission to the jury. The direction in favor of the plaintiff was right, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

No specific time was fixed for the completion of the repairs by the landlord. There was, therefore, no breach of covenant on his part. The rent became due and payable under the lease, and was not paid. A tender was made; but, to be available, it must be kept good at all times. The debt is not paid by the tender. There was nothing in the case which required its submission to the jury. The direction in favor of the plaintiff was right, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y.S. 69, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronin-v-epstein-nynyccityct-1888.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack