Cronin v. Bienenzucht

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cronin v. Bienenzucht

113 N.Y.S. 546

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 113 N.Y.S. 546 (Cronin v. Bienenzucht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cronin v. Bienenzucht, 113 N.Y.S. 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

HENDRICK, J.

Appeal from an order setting aside a verdict of the jury as against the weight of evidence. The rule is that, on appeals from orders granting or refusing new trials upon a claim that the verdict is against the evidence, the decision of the trial judge is of the weightiest influence, Aldridge v. Aldridge, 120 N. Y. 614—617, 24 N. E. 1022. The record not only shows no abuse of the discretion which is reposed in the trial justice, but amply sustains the order set- ' ting aside the verdict.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENDRICK, J.

Appeal from an order setting aside a verdict of the jury as against the weight of evidence. The rule is that, on appeals from orders granting or refusing new trials upon a claim that the verdict is against the evidence, the decision of the trial judge is of the weightiest influence, Aldridge v. Aldridge, 120 N. Y. 614—617, 24 N. E. 1022. The record not only shows no abuse of the discretion which is reposed in the trial justice, but amply sustains the order set- ' ting aside the verdict.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 N.Y.S. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronin-v-bienenzucht-nyappterm-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack