Cronin v. Anderson

226 A.D. 691
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion for an order directing the respondent to submit to a physical examination reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Respondent was examined by defendant’s doctor prior to the beginning of the action. No examination was had “ in the action,” as provided by section 306 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendant, therefore, has not waived the statutory remedy. The ease of Whitaker v. Staten Island M. R. R. Co. (76 App. Div. 351) can be distinguished, because in that ease the first examination [692] was had after the action had been instituted. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Rich and Carswell, JJ., dissent. Settle order on notice, at which time a physician to make the examination will be named and the time and place of the examination will be fixed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cronin v. Anderson, 226 A.D. 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

226 A.D. 691 (Cronin v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. Marcus & Sons, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
24 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Swiatlowski v. Kasprzyk
2 Misc. 2d 707 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Anthony v. Bradshaw
282 A.D. 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
McCabe v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
252 A.D. 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)