Crone v. Connelly

819 A.2d 836, 263 Conn. 902, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 122
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 19, 2003
DocketSC 16965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 819 A.2d 836 (Crone v. Connelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crone v. Connelly, 819 A.2d 836, 263 Conn. 902, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 122 (Colo. 2003).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 788 (AC 22156), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crone v. Connelly
840 A.2d 552 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
819 A.2d 836, 263 Conn. 902, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crone-v-connelly-conn-2003.