Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh

12 La. Ann. 269
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Merrick, C. J.

We consider the objections to the form of the action virtually determined by the decree of this court remanding the cause in order to make parties. See case, 9 An. 302.

[270]*270The plaintiff Oronan and the appellants, the Cities of Baltimore and New Orleans, the universel legatees under the will of McBonogh, claim title through A. Hodge, Jr.

The act of sale from Hodge to Oonrey was duly recorded, and although junior to the auction sale under which the legatees of MeBonogh claim, must nevertheless prevail over it, because among other reasons it does not appear that the auctioneers were authorized in writing to make the sale. C. C. 2584; 9 An. 363.

The universal legatees of the will of MeBonogh being without interest in the property, cannot question the 'sale to Cronan for irregularities, if any such exist.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh, 12 La. Ann. 269 (La. 1857).

12 La. Ann. 269 (Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Third Dist. Land Co. v. Lassere
15 So. 2d 850 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1943)
Silverstein v. Koppel
118 So. 224 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Harang v. Gheens Realty Co.
98 So. 760 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)