Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh

12 La. Ann. 269
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 La. Ann. 269 (Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh, 12 La. Ann. 269 (La. 1857).

Opinion

Merrick, C. J.

We consider the objections to the form of the action virtually determined by the decree of this court remanding the cause in order to make parties. See case, 9 An. 302.

[270]*270The plaintiff Oronan and the appellants, the Cities of Baltimore and New Orleans, the universel legatees under the will of McBonogh, claim title through A. Hodge, Jr.

The act of sale from Hodge to Oonrey was duly recorded, and although junior to the auction sale under which the legatees of MeBonogh claim, must nevertheless prevail over it, because among other reasons it does not appear that the auctioneers were authorized in writing to make the sale. C. C. 2584; 9 An. 363.

The universal legatees of the will of MeBonogh being without interest in the property, cannot question the 'sale to Cronan for irregularities, if any such exist.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Third Dist. Land Co. v. Lassere
15 So. 2d 850 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1943)
Silverstein v. Koppel
118 So. 224 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Harang v. Gheens Realty Co.
98 So. 760 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 La. Ann. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronan-v-succession-of-mcdonogh-la-1857.