Cromwell v. Foster
This text of 27 Misc. 121 (Cromwell v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an áction for foreclosure, a subsequent mortgagee sets up his mortgage, hy answer, and demands that it be pay[122]*122able next from the .surplus. Service of this answer was. made upon all defendants who appeared in the action, and they have failed to take issue. It may be that lienors in priority to the answering.defendant have failed to appear, yet this would not bar their right to priority in the surplus after satisfaction of. plaintiff’s lien, and, accordingly, the answering defendant has not shown himself to be entitled to the direction which he asks. See Code' Civ. Pro. § 521. His remedy is against the surplus. The motion of the plaintiff is, therefore, granted, and the application of the defendant Strasbourger denied, with $10 costs.
Motion granted and application denied, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Misc. 121, 57 N.Y.S. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromwell-v-foster-nysupct-1899.