Cromwell v. Bynner
This text of 181 A.D. 893 (Cromwell v. Bynner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We find no concession that at the date to which the closing of title was adjourned there were defects in the title, and there is no competent proof of the existence of defects. Should we assume the existence of defects asserted but not proved, they were of a nature that could be seasonably cured. The assignee submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court by reason of his taking the assignment and his subsequent interference with the proceeding. Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromwell-v-bynner-nyappdiv-1917.