Crompton v. State
881 So. 2d 635, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11712, 2004 WL 1773650
Opinion
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of May 24, 2004, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Patterson v. State, 868 So.2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Appellant’s motion to treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus is DE[636]*636NIED. See Madden v. State, 780 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crompton v. State, 881 So. 2d 635, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11712, 2004 WL 1773650 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
881 So. 2d 635 (Crompton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Madden v. State
780 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Patterson v. State
868 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)