Crompton v. State

881 So. 2d 635, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11712, 2004 WL 1773650
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 10, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-1097
StatusPublished

This text of 881 So. 2d 635 (Crompton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crompton v. State, 881 So. 2d 635, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11712, 2004 WL 1773650 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of May 24, 2004, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Patterson v. State, 868 So.2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Appellant’s motion to treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus is DE[636]*636NIED. See Madden v. State, 780 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

WOLF, C.J., KAHN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madden v. State
780 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Patterson v. State
868 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 So. 2d 635, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11712, 2004 WL 1773650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crompton-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.