Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 325, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 525

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 30, 1950

DocketNo. 54900; protest 162344-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cust. Ct. 325 (Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 325, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 525 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the official papers revealed that more than 60 days elapsed between the date of liquidation of the entry and the date of the filing of protest. The protest was therefore dismissed as untimely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the official papers revealed that more than 60 days elapsed between the date of liquidation of the entry and the date of the filing of protest. The protest was therefore dismissed as untimely.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Cust. Ct. 325, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crompton-richmond-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.