Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 325, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 525

United States Customs Court·Decided November 30, 1950·No. No. 54900; protest 162344-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the official papers revealed that more than 60 days elapsed between the date of liquidation of the entry and the date of the filing of protest. The protest was therefore dismissed as untimely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the official papers revealed that more than 60 days elapsed between the date of liquidation of the entry and the date of the filing of protest. The protest was therefore dismissed as untimely.

Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 325, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 525 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

25 Cust. Ct. 325 (Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.