Cromer v. State

100 So. 3d 68, 2011 WL 5188989, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17351
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 2011
DocketNo. 2D09-4801
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 68 (Cromer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cromer v. State, 100 So. 3d 68, 2011 WL 5188989, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17351 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

In this Anders1 appeal, we note that Edrew Cromer entered a no contest plea to, and the trial court adjudicated him guilty of, contracting without a license and grand theft ($100,000 or more). However, there is a scrivener’s error in the written judgment reflecting that Cromer was adjudicated guilty of the offense of grand theft ($10,000 or more). Therefore, we remand this case for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment reflecting that Cromer was adjudicated guilty of contracting without a license and grand theft ($100,000 or more). His judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

SILBERMAN, C.J., and CRENSHAW, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 3d 68, 2011 WL 5188989, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromer-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.