Cromer v. State
This text of 100 So. 3d 68 (Cromer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this Anders1 appeal, we note that Edrew Cromer entered a no contest plea to, and the trial court adjudicated him guilty of, contracting without a license and grand theft ($100,000 or more). However, there is a scrivener’s error in the written judgment reflecting that Cromer was adjudicated guilty of the offense of grand theft ($10,000 or more). Therefore, we remand this case for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment reflecting that Cromer was adjudicated guilty of contracting without a license and grand theft ($100,000 or more). His judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 So. 3d 68, 2011 WL 5188989, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromer-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.