Cromer v. Cromer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cromer v. Cromer

274 A.D.2d 371, 711 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered May 4, 1998, the defendant former husband appeals from (1) so much of an amended judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), entered August 23, 1999, as directed him to pay the plaintiff the sum of $17,066, as an attorney’s fee, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Parga, J.), entered January 19, 2000, which, on the issue of an attorney’s fee, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $17,066.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly directed the defendant to pay to the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the principal sum of $17,066 (see, Webbe v Webbe, 267 AB2d 764; Flanagan v Flanagan, 267 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered May 4, 1998, the defendant former husband appeals from (1) so much of an amended judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), entered August 23, 1999, as directed him to pay the plaintiff the sum of $17,066, as an attorney’s fee, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Parga, J.), entered January 19, 2000, which, on the issue of an attorney’s fee, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $17,066.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly directed the defendant to pay to the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the principal sum of $17,066 (see, Webbe v Webbe, 267 AB2d 764; Flanagan v Flanagan, 267 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cromer v. Cromer, 274 A.D.2d 371, 711 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

274 A.D.2d 371 (Cromer v. Cromer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related