Cromarty v. Madison Square Garden Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cromarty v. Madison Square Garden Corp.

66 A.D.2d 791, 411 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14084

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 791 (Cromarty v. Madison Square Garden Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cromarty v. Madison Square Garden Corp., 66 A.D.2d 791, 411 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme [792]*792Court, Westchester County, dated January 9, 1978, which denied their application for a general preference, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated March 15, 1978, which denied their motion for reargument. Appeal from the order dated March 15, 1978 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Order dated January 9, 1978 reversed, without costs or disbursements, and general preference granted. In view of the conflicting medical opinions as to the permanency of the infant plaintiffs’ injuries, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a preference. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme [792]*792Court, Westchester County, dated January 9, 1978, which denied their application for a general preference, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated March 15, 1978, which denied their motion for reargument. Appeal from the order dated March 15, 1978 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Order dated January 9, 1978 reversed, without costs or disbursements, and general preference granted. In view of the conflicting medical opinions as to the permanency of the infant plaintiffs’ injuries, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a preference. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 791, 411 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromarty-v-madison-square-garden-corp-nyappdiv-1978.