Cromartie v. Hunt

34 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22157, 1998 WL 968243
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina
DecidedApril 3, 1998
DocketCiv. 4:96-CV104-BO(3)
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 34 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (Cromartie v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cromartie v. Hunt, 34 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22157, 1998 WL 968243 (E.D.N.C. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

TERRENCE W. BOYLE, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court of Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Following a hearing on Tuesday, March 31, 1998, the Court took these motions under advisement and now issues the following ruling:

1) Finding that the Twelfth Congressional District under the 1997 North Carolina congressional redistricting plan is unconstitutional, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to the Twelfth Congressional District.
2) Based upon the Court’s finding that the Twelfth Congressional District is unconstitutional, it is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction as contained in its complaint are GRANTED. Defendants are hereby ENJOINED from conducting any primary or general election for congressional offices under the redistricting plan enacted as 1997 N.C. Session Laws, Chapter 11.
3) It is further ORDERED that the parties file a written submission no later than Wednesday, April 8,1998, addressing the following issues:
a) An appropriate time period within which the North Carolina General Assembly may be allowed the opportunity to correct the constitutional defects in the 1997 plan, in default of which the Court would undertake the task.
b) A proposed election schedule to follow redistricting which provides for a primary election process culminating in a general congressional election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 1998.

This order and permanent injunction are entered by a majority of the three-judge panel. Circuit Judge Sam J. Ervin, III, dis *1030 sents. Memoranda with reference to this order will be issued as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. McCrory
159 F. Supp. 3d 600 (M.D. North Carolina, 2016)
Dickson v. Rucho
368 N.C. 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2015)
Hunt v. Cromartie
526 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22157, 1998 WL 968243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromartie-v-hunt-nced-1998.