Croft v. Cone

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Croft v. Cone

199 S.E. 664, 58 Ga. App. 637, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 80

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 1938·No. 27006·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

1. The only assignment of error argued or insisted on in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is that the verdict in the county court was without evidence to support it, and that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari. It appearing that there was evidence to support the verdict, this court is without authority to reverse the judgment.

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., oonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

1. The only assignment of error argued or insisted on in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is that the verdict in the county court was without evidence to support it, and that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari. It appearing that there was evidence to support the verdict, this court is without authority to reverse the judgment.

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., oonour.

Croft v. Cone, 199 S.E. 664, 58 Ga. App. 637, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 80 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

199 S.E. 664 (Croft v. Cone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.