Croft v. City of Roanoke
This text of 506 F. App'x 218 (Croft v. City of Roanoke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dennis Croft, a former captain with the City of Roanoke Fire/EMS Department, appeals the district court’s order granting the City of Roanoke’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. See Croft v. City of Roanoke, 862 F.Supp.2d 487 (W.D.Va.2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
506 F. App'x 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croft-v-city-of-roanoke-ca4-2013.