Croft v. Bunting

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Croft v. Bunting

1 A.2d 331, 121 N.J.L. 51, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 387

DecidedSeptember 16, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.2d 331 (Croft v. Bunting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Croft v. Bunting, 1 A.2d 331, 121 N.J.L. 51, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 387 (N.J. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

*52 Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the record in these cases and the briefs and argument of counsel and can only conclude that the questions of fact were property found and the questions of law were correctly settled by the learned trial judge.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Poster, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*52 Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the record in these cases and the briefs and argument of counsel and can only conclude that the questions of fact were property found and the questions of law were correctly settled by the learned trial judge.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Poster, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.2d 331, 121 N.J.L. 51, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croft-v-bunting-nj-1938.