Crofott, Nielsen & Co. v. McKinney

148 F.2d 371, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2455
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 1945
DocketNo. 10868
StatusPublished

This text of 148 F.2d 371 (Crofott, Nielsen & Co. v. McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crofott, Nielsen & Co. v. McKinney, 148 F.2d 371, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2455 (9th Cir. 1945).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends that the evidence of the use of appellant’s patent as substantially against the public interest does not support the finding to that effect. We do not agree.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 F.2d 371, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crofott-nielsen-co-v-mckinney-ca9-1945.