Crofott, Nielsen & Co. v. McKinney
148 F.2d 371, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2455
Opinion
Appellant contends that the evidence of the use of appellant’s patent as substantially against the public interest does not support the finding to that effect. We do not agree.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crofott, Nielsen & Co. v. McKinney, 148 F.2d 371, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2455 (9th Cir. 1945).
148 F.2d 371 (Crofott, Nielsen & Co. v. McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.