Crockett v. Wofford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Crockett v. Wofford

144 S.E. 27, 166 Ga. 630, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 363

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 12, 1928

DocketNo. 6278

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 S.E. 27 (Crockett v. Wofford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crockett v. Wofford, 144 S.E. 27, 166 Ga. 630, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 363 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

After amendment, the petition of A. G. and Mrs. W. F. Wofford against J. E. Crockett set forth substantially the following allegations: Petitioners are the owners of a described lot offland in Fulton County, Georgia, and are in possession thereof. Defendant has threatened to enter upon that lot and destroy a wire fence which petitioners had put up for the protection of their property. He has threatened to seize a ten-foot strip of land in dispute and to put improvements upon it, in trespass of petitioners’ rights, which improvements will be in the nature of a “wiener-stand” and sign-boards. If defendant'is permitted to carry out his threatened acts, petitioners will suffer irreparable injury and damage, and such trespass will constitute a breach of the peace. They are remediless unless the defendant is enjoined from carrying out his threats as just stated. After a hearing the court overruled a general demurrer to the petition, and the defendant excepted. Although equity will not interfere to restrain a trespass, unless the injury would be irreparable in damages or there exist other circumstances which in the discretion.of the court render the interposition of this writ necessary and proper under the facts stated in the pleadings, in this case the court did not err in overruling the de[631]*631murrer to the plaintiffs’ petition. The facts of this case distinguish it altogether from those in Paramore v. Persons, 57 Ga. 473, where the single object was to enjoin the defendant from entering into the possession of the land; and from Griner v. Culpepper, 164 Ga. 858 (139 S. E. 666). It is apparent from the allegations that the damages which would be suffered by the petitioners would be irreparable and not capable of accurate computation, and that the proposed trespass would constitute a breach of the peace.

Judgment affvrmed.

All the Justices concur, except Afkinson and Hill, JJ., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

After amendment, the petition of A. G. and Mrs. W. F. Wofford against J. E. Crockett set forth substantially the following allegations: Petitioners are the owners of a described lot offland in Fulton County, Georgia, and are in possession thereof. Defendant has threatened to enter upon that lot and destroy a wire fence which petitioners had put up for the protection of their property. He has threatened to seize a ten-foot strip of land in dispute and to put improvements upon it, in trespass of petitioners’ rights, which improvements will be in the nature of a “wiener-stand” and sign-boards. If defendant'is permitted to carry out his threatened acts, petitioners will suffer irreparable injury and damage, and such trespass will constitute a breach of the peace. They are remediless unless the defendant is enjoined from carrying out his threats as just stated. After a hearing the court overruled a general demurrer to the petition, and the defendant excepted. Although equity will not interfere to restrain a trespass, unless the injury would be irreparable in damages or there exist other circumstances which in the discretion.of the court render the interposition of this writ necessary and proper under the facts stated in the pleadings, in this case the court did not err in overruling the de[631]*631murrer to the plaintiffs’ petition. The facts of this case distinguish it altogether from those in Paramore v. Persons, 57 Ga. 473, where the single object was to enjoin the defendant from entering into the possession of the land; and from Griner v. Culpepper, 164 Ga. 858 (139 S. E. 666). It is apparent from the allegations that the damages which would be suffered by the petitioners would be irreparable and not capable of accurate computation, and that the proposed trespass would constitute a breach of the peace.

Judgment affvrmed.

All the Justices concur, except Afkinson and Hill, JJ., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.E. 27, 166 Ga. 630, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crockett-v-wofford-ga-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack