Crockett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Crockett v. State

182 S.W. 1119

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crockett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 Tex. Crim. 163 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 1916·No. No. 3947·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and assessed the lowest punishment. ■

The sole question is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. There is no bill of exceptions, and no complaint to the charge of the court.

We have carefully read the testimony more than once, and think it clear that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. We can see no necessity for detailing the testimony.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and assessed the lowest punishment. ■

The sole question is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. There is no bill of exceptions, and no complaint to the charge of the court.

We have carefully read the testimony more than once, and think it clear that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. We can see no necessity for detailing the testimony.

The judgment is affirmed.

Crockett v. State, 182 S.W. 1119 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

182 S.W. 1119 (Crockett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.