Crockett v. State

91 So. 3d 872, 2012 WL 1759378, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7993
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2012·No. No. 2D11-3939·Published

Opinion

WALLACE, Judge.

Robert B. Crockett appeals the order denying his postconviction motion filed in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in which he raised four grounds for relief. We find no reversible error, and we affirm the postconviction court’s order without discussion.

However, Mr. Crockett’s judgment and sentence erroneously states that he was convicted and sentenced for “domestic violence] battery” on count one of the information. “Domestic violence] battery” is a nonexistent offense. Accordingly, we remand for the postconviction court to correct Mr. Crockett’s judgment and sentence to reflect that he was convicted and sentenced for battery on count one of [873]*873the information, not “domestic violence] battery.”

Affirmed; remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence.

LaROSE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crockett v. State, 91 So. 3d 872, 2012 WL 1759378, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7993 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

91 So. 3d 872 (Crockett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.