Crockett v. State
620 So. 2d 1306, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623, 1993 WL 267379
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 1993·No. No. 93-0215·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reversed and remanded for a new trial. We agree with appellant that the trial court failed to make a sufficient inquiry concerning the apparent conflict of interest of appellant’s counsel in his representation of appellant as well as a prosecution witness. See DeArce v. State, 405 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crockett v. State, 620 So. 2d 1306, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623, 1993 WL 267379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
620 So. 2d 1306 (Crockett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cadejuste v. State
993 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)