Crockett v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs & Markets, Inc.

536 P.2d 490, 91 Nev. 407
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1975·No. No. 7467·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this “slip and fall” personal injury action, the jury, upon conflicting evidence, returned a verdict for the defendant. In the factual context of this case, we perceive no prejudicial error in the district court’s rulings on evidence and instructions to the jury, and accordingly we affirm. See American Cas. Co. v. Propane Sales & Serv., 89 Nev. 398, 513 P.2d 1226 (1973); Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel, 86 Nev. 408, 470 P.2d 135 (1970); Eldorado Club, Inc., v. Francis B. Graff, 78 Nev. 507, 377 P.2d 174 (1962); Yturralde v. Barney’s Club, Inc., 87 Nev. 249, 484 P.2d 1079 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crockett v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs & Markets, Inc., 536 P.2d 490, 91 Nev. 407 (Neb. 1975).

536 P.2d 490 (Crockett v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs & Markets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eldorado Club, Inc. v. Graff
377 P.2d 174 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1962)
American Casualty Co. v. Propane Sales & Service, Inc.
513 P.2d 1226 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel Corporation
470 P.2d 135 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)
Yturralde v. Barney's Club, Inc.
484 P.2d 1079 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1971)