Crockett v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs & Markets, Inc.
This text of 536 P.2d 490 (Crockett v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs & Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In this “slip and fall” personal injury action, the jury, upon conflicting evidence, returned a verdict for the defendant. In the factual context of this case, we perceive no prejudicial error in the district court’s rulings on evidence and instructions to the jury, and accordingly we affirm. See American Cas. Co. v. Propane Sales & Serv., 89 Nev. 398, 513 P.2d 1226 (1973); Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel, 86 Nev. 408, 470 P.2d 135 (1970); Eldorado Club, Inc., v. Francis B. Graff, 78 Nev. 507, 377 P.2d 174 (1962); Yturralde v. Barney’s Club, Inc., 87 Nev. 249, 484 P.2d 1079 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
536 P.2d 490, 91 Nev. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crockett-v-eagle-thrifty-drugs-markets-inc-nev-1975.