Crocker-Wheeler Electric Co. v. Hill
41 A. 1115, 60 N.J.L. 241, 31 Vroom 241, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 49
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in its per curiam opinion.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syokel, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crocker-Wheeler Electric Co. v. Hill, 41 A. 1115, 60 N.J.L. 241, 31 Vroom 241, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 49 (N.J. 1897).
41 A. 1115 (Crocker-Wheeler Electric Co. v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.