Crocker v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Crocker v. Young

14 S.C. Eq. 30

DecidedDecember 15, 1838

StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.C. Eq. 30 (Crocker v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crocker v. Young, 14 S.C. Eq. 30 (S.C. Ct. App. 1838).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per Dunkin, Ch.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. It has been suggested that the complainant, who has been directed to pay the costs, is utterly insolvént. It is, therefore, ordered that the conveyance of the land on the west side of the river, to be executed by the defendant, be deposited in the hands of the commissioner, not to be delivered to the complainant until the costs are fully paid.

Johnson, Harper and Johnston, Chancellors, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per Dunkin, Ch.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. It has been suggested that the complainant, who has been directed to pay the costs, is utterly insolvént. It is, therefore, ordered that the conveyance of the land on the west side of the river, to be executed by the defendant, be deposited in the hands of the commissioner, not to be delivered to the complainant until the costs are fully paid.

Johnson, Harper and Johnston, Chancellors, concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 S.C. Eq. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crocker-v-young-scctapp-1838.