Crocker v. VanBrunt

Circuit Court of the 48th Circuit of Michigan

Crocker v. VanBrunt

1 Mich. N.P. 46

CourtCircuit Court of the 48th Circuit of Michigan

DecidedOctober 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mich. N.P. 46 (Crocker v. VanBrunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 48th Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crocker v. VanBrunt, 1 Mich. N.P. 46 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Brown, J.

By Ch., Rule 112, adopted as a restriction upon powers of commissioners, it is provided that no commissioner shall grant any injunction, without first giving reasonable notice of the time and place of hearing the application therefor, to the adverse party, “ unless, in his opinion, the peculiar exigences of the case require it, for manifest reasons, to be shown by affidavit.”

[47]*47The rule is not restrictive as to who shall make the affidavit. It may be made by any person having knowledge ofu the peculiar exigences of the case.’’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown, J.

By Ch., Rule 112, adopted as a restriction upon powers of commissioners, it is provided that no commissioner shall grant any injunction, without first giving reasonable notice of the time and place of hearing the application therefor, to the adverse party, “ unless, in his opinion, the peculiar exigences of the case require it, for manifest reasons, to be shown by affidavit.”

[47]*47The rule is not restrictive as to who shall make the affidavit. It may be made by any person having knowledge ofu the peculiar exigences of the case.’’

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mich. N.P. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crocker-v-vanbrunt-micirct48-1869.