Crocker v. . Knickerbocker Ice Company
92 N.Y. 652, 1883 N.Y. LEXIS 231
Opinion
opinion for affirmance. Rapallo, Mlller} Earl and Fmon, JJ., concur. Rug-er, Ch. J. Andrews and Dakforth, JJ., dissent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crocker v. . Knickerbocker Ice Company, 92 N.Y. 652, 1883 N.Y. LEXIS 231 (N.Y. 1883).
92 N.Y. 652 (Crocker v. . Knickerbocker Ice Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fullerton v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
37 A.D. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Axlebrood v. Rosen
21 Misc. 352 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Campbell v. Wood
22 A.D. 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Weller v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
23 S.W. 1061 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Keck v. Sandford
2 Misc. 484 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1893)
Keck v. Sandford
51 N.Y. St. Rep. 150 (New York City Court, 1893)
Van Houten v. Fleischmann
20 N.Y.S. 643 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)
Denman v. Johnston
48 N.W. 565 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Brown v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railroad
18 Jones & S. 106 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1884)