Crocker v. Fox

1 Root 227
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The widow’s dower is paramount to the right of the creditors or heirs, and it is not in the power of either to defeat it. It is the duty of the heirs, etc. to have the widow’s dower assigned and set out to her, within sixty days, etc. and the creditors of the heir take his share, charged with that incumbrance, if this hath not been previously done. And the widow hath right to have her dower set out without prejudice, by anything the heir or his creditors have done.

The second appointment was so made as it did not supersede the first; their doings and return was valid and good.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crocker v. Fox, 1 Root 227 (Colo. 1790).

1 Root 227 (Crocker v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greathead
42 Conn. 374 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1875)
Cavender v. Smith
8 Iowa 360 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1859)