Crocker v. Claughly
This text of 2 Duer 684 (Crocker v. Claughly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs, in an action for the recovery of money, only obtained a verdict for $35,.which they immediately assigned to their attorney. Judgment was subsequently entered and perfected, and was, that the plaintiffs should recover the $35, and the defendant his costs, amounting to $65.56. The defendant, upon an affidavit of the facts, and of the insolvency of the plaintiffs, moved that the judgment of the plaintiffs should be satisfied by a set-off of an equal amount of the costs which he had recovered.
The Chief Justice, without passing upon other questions which were raised, held that the insolvency of the plaintiffs was not only a sufficient, but a conclusive reason for granting the motion.
Approved on consultation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Duer 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crocker-v-claughly-nysuperctnyc-1853.