Crocker v. City of Lowell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Crocker v. City of Lowell

231 Mass. 249

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedNovember 14, 1918

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 231 Mass. 249 (Crocker v. City of Lowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crocker v. City of Lowell, 231 Mass. 249 (Mass. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The only question involved in this case was whether one of the plaintiffs, named Bailey, was domiciled in Lowell or in Greenfield in the State of New Hampshire in 1916. Bailey testified to facts which showed that his domicil was in Greenfield. It is manifest from the general finding in favor of the plaintiffs that the judge believed this testimony. The credibility of this evidence was wholly for the determination of the trial judge. Therefore there was no error of law in the refusal to make the findings requested by the defendant.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The only question involved in this case was whether one of the plaintiffs, named Bailey, was domiciled in Lowell or in Greenfield in the State of New Hampshire in 1916. Bailey testified to facts which showed that his domicil was in Greenfield. It is manifest from the general finding in favor of the plaintiffs that the judge believed this testimony. The credibility of this evidence was wholly for the determination of the trial judge. Therefore there was no error of law in the refusal to make the findings requested by the defendant.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 Mass. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crocker-v-city-of-lowell-mass-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack