Crocker v. Black
16 Mass. 448
Opinion
The same principle applies in this case, as in actions of trespass. The title to real estate may, and indeed must necessarily [371] come into question in actions like this at bar. For the plaintifi must show a right, or at the least a possession, before he can put the defendant upon his defence. Let full costs be taxed for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crocker v. Black, 16 Mass. 448 (Mass. 1820).
16 Mass. 448 (Crocker v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Apolo v. Kauo
7 Haw. 755 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1889)
Burnham v. Ross
47 Me. 456 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1860)
Williams v. Veazie
8 Me. 106 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1831)
Plympton v. Baker
27 Mass. 473 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1830)
Pritchard v. Atkinson
4 N.H. 291 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1828)