Crocker

133 Ct. Cl. 967
United States Court of Claims·Decided November 8, 1955·No. No. 50254·Published

Opinion

Suit for salary. Plaintiff entitled to recover. Opinion 130 C. Cls. 567.

In accordance with the opinion of the court and on a stipulation by the parties showing the amount due thereunder, judgment for the plaintiff was entered for $11,167.91.

Defendant’s motion for rehearing or reconsideration overruled January 31, 1956.

Retired Pay Navy Enlisted Men

Following the opinion of the court in the case of Christopher C. Sanders v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 501, and upon [968] stipulations of the parties showing the amounts due each of the plaintiffs for additional pay for service in the United States Navy, judgments were entered for the respective plaintiffs for the amounts stated in the several stipulations as follows:

ON NOVEMBER 8, 1955
Docket No. Number of Judgments
264r-52 1
414r-52_. 520-53. 490-54.. 1 1 4

Philippines Claims Dismissed

Jurisdiction; claims from Philippines.

Following the opinion in Eleuterio Logronio v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 596, in which the opinion in Victorio v. Limited States, 122 C. Cls. 708, was overruled, the petitions in the following cases were dismissed, in open court, November 8, 1955, on defendant’s motions:

No. 49541. Isidro Vietorio

No. 69-53. Sergio Q. Pates

No. 493-52. Claro S. Ong

No. 97-53. Estelita L. DeSalido

No. 50300 (4). Juanito P. Pastrana, et al., in ease of Gerónimo Saololo

No. 50300 (12). Juanito P. Pastrana, et al., in case of Capt. Eicardo A. Pronove, et al.

No. 50126 Vicenta Totengco

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crocker, 133 Ct. Cl. 967 (cc 1955).

133 Ct. Cl. 967 (Crocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Victorio v. United States
106 F. Supp. 182 (Court of Claims, 1952)
Crocker v. United States
127 F. Supp. 568 (Court of Claims, 1955)
Logronio v. United States
133 F. Supp. 395 (Court of Claims, 1955)
Sanders v. United States
120 Ct. Cl. 501 (Court of Claims, 1951)